Our best AR/VR & mixed reality headsets, dev kits & spatial computing accessories picks
The short version
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 Enterprise Pick — The enterprise AR workhorse for hands-free remote assist, training and field service.
- Varjo XR-4 Pro Visuals — Human-eye-resolution mixed reality for simulation, training and design review.
- Magic Leap 2 Enterprise AR — Lightweight enterprise AR with the widest field of view in its class.
- Meta Quest 3 Best for Devs — The best-value mixed-reality headset and the default dev kit for spatial computing.
- BOBOVR S3 Pro Battery Halo Strap Top Accessory — Hot-swappable battery halo strap that roughly doubles Quest 3 runtime.
Compare at a glance
Feature availability is summarized from each provider's own published materials — always confirm details on the official site. Cells marked “Not verified” mean we have not confirmed that attribute from a primary source.
| Feature | Microsoft HoloLens 2Enterprise Pick | Varjo XR-4Pro Visuals | Magic Leap 2Enterprise AR | Meta Quest 3Best for Devs | BOBOVR S3 Pro Battery Halo StrapTop Accessory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get started |
The services, in detail
How these picks are made
Summaries are based on each provider’s own published information. We link only to programs we could verify, and every recommendation is labeled.
Our methodology →Not sure where to start? Our free fit quiz narrows it down in under a minute, the cost calculator estimates your current spend from numbers you enter, and the choosing guide walks through credentials, costs, and policies.
Frequently asked questions
Which AR/VR & mixed reality headsets, dev kits & spatial computing accessories service is best?
There is no single best AR/VR & mixed reality headsets, dev kits & spatial computing accessories service — the right choice depends on what you need. SpatialStack features 5 services (Microsoft HoloLens 2, Varjo XR-4, Magic Leap 2, Meta Quest 3, BOBOVR S3 Pro Battery Halo Strap); the comparison table on this page lists each one's focus, format, and positioning, drawn from the providers' own published information, so you can match a service to your situation.
How does SpatialStack choose which services to feature?
Summaries are based on each provider's own published information. We link only to programs we could verify, and every recommendation is labeled. You can read more about how this site works on the About page.
Does SpatialStack earn a commission from these links?
We may earn a commission when you buy an XR headset, dev kit or accessory through links on this site, but that never changes which hardware we recommend.
More guides & articles
HoloLens 1 vs 2: Which Headset Still Fits Your XR Stack?
HoloLens 1 vs 2 is a comparison that matters less as a purchasing decision and more as a question of fleet management and migration: Microsoft ended produc
Read the review →Best Hand Tracking 2026: Top Picks Compared
Hand tracking is the use of cameras and computer vision to locate hands and fingers in 3D space without controllers, and in 2026 the practical shortlist of
Read the review →HoloLens 2 vs Magic Leap 2: Best Picks Compared
HoloLens 2 vs Magic Leap 2 is a two-way comparison between the Azure-anchored Microsoft Snapdragon 850-powered headset and the business-focused, dimming-ca
Read the review →HoloLens 2 vs Quest Pro: Enterprise XR Compared
HoloLens 2 vs Quest Pro is a comparison of two fundamentally different headsets: Microsoft's HoloLens 2 is a see-through optical AR device with a diagonal
Read the review →HoloLens 2 vs Quest 3: Best Headset Compared (2026)
HoloLens 2 vs Quest 3 isn't a like-for-like contest: HoloLens 2 is a tetherless optical see-through AR device for enterprise, worth $3,500, while Quest 3 i
Read the review →HoloLens 2 vs Quest: Enterprise XR Compared
Microsoft's HoloLens 2 and Meta's Quest 3 represent two distinct XR architectures: HoloLens 2 is a see-through optical augmented-reality headset with enter
Read the review →